Maintenance Cediranib in Ovarian Cancer Fails to Show Significant OS Improvement

Article

Despite previously reported progression-free survival improvements with cediranib, results from the ICON6 trial failed to show a statistically significant improvement in overall survival.

Despite previously reported improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) associated with the investigational oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 inhibitor cediranib (AZD 2171), cediranib was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, according to results of an analysis of mature long-term survival data from the ICON6 trial, presented (abstract 5506) at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 2–6 in Chicago.

The study was “unavoidably underpowered” for assessing survival outcomes because of low accrual. Nevertheless, the numeric median difference in OS time was 7.4 months, with the deaths of 85% of patients having been reported, noted lead study author Jonathan A. Ledermann, MD, of the University College London Cancer Institute in England.

The study authors had enrolled women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or serous primary peritoneal cancer who experienced computed tomography (CT)- or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed relapse more than 6 months after primary chemotherapy. Patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 deemed able to undergo platinum-based chemotherapy were included; those with uncontrolled hypertension, arterial thrombosis or hemorrhage, or recent surgery were not eligible.

The study involved a safety stage, an activity stage (with PFS and OS outcomes), and an efficacy stage (OS). However, in October of 2011, with 440 patients enrolled out of 2,000 planned for the efficacy stage, AstraZeneca discontinued cediranib development, and the authors revised the study design, making PFS the primary endpoint and OS and toxicity secondary endpoints for the efficacy stage.

As previously reported, PFS was 8.7 months in the placebo arm vs 11.1 months for patients receiving cediranib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45–0.74; P = .00001), Dr. Ledermann said.

However, at a median follow-up of 25.6 months, the newly reported OS results for chemotherapy with concurrent and maintenance cediranib were not significantly better than the results for chemotherapy and placebo (median OS, 27.3 vs 19.9 months; P = .21). Maintenance therapy with chemotherapy and cediranib was associated with a median time from diagnosis to death of 51.3 months, compared with 43.3 months for chemotherapy and placebo.

Cediranib maintenance therapy is undergoing further study in ICON9, Dr. Ledermann said.

Related Videos
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Developing novel regimens may continue to improve survival outcomes of patients with advanced cervical cancer following the FDA approval of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation, says Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD.
Treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation appears to be well tolerated with no detriment to quality of life among those with advanced cervical cancer.
Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, says that pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation will be seamlessly incorporated into her institution’s treatment of those with FIGO 2014 stage III to IVA cervical cancer following the regimen’s FDA approval.
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, says that paying attention to the quality of chemoradiotherapy is imperative to feeling confident about the potential addition of pembrolizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Guidelines from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology may help with managing the ongoing chemotherapy shortage in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancers, according to Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Interim data reveal favorable responses in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with avutometinib plus defactinib, according to Susana N. Banerjee, MD.
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG, notes that sometimes there is a need to substitute cisplatin for carboplatin, and vice versa, to best manage gynecologic cancers during the chemotherapy shortage.
Findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a standard treatment option for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to elicit ‘impressive’ responses among patients with HER2-positive gynecologic cancers regardless of immunohistochemistry in the phase 2 DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial.