Multiple Myeloma

>

Latest News

Findings from the CARTITUDE-2 trial support the use of cilta-cel in patients with multiple myeloma, says Tina Glow, AAS, RN, BSN.
Cilta-cel Yields Sustained Responses in R/R Multiple Myeloma

April 25th 2024

Findings from the CARTITUDE-2 trial support the use of cilta-cel in patients with multiple myeloma, says Tina Glow, AAS, RN, BSN.

The latest CARTITUDE-4 data examine the efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.
Cilta-cel Shows High Responses for Lenalidomide-Refractory Myeloma in First Relapse

April 25th 2024

Patients enrolled across the CARTITUDE trials who experienced cranial nerve palsy after treatment with cilta-cel were generally male.
Cranial Nerve Palsy Present Across CARTITUDE Trials in Multiple Myeloma

April 25th 2024

Findings from the phase 3 CARTITUDE-4 trial support the European approval of ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
European Commission Approves Cilta-cel in R/R Multiple Myeloma

April 24th 2024

ODAC Approves MRD End Point in Multiple Myeloma Trials
ODAC Approves MRD End Point in Multiple Myeloma Trials

April 12th 2024

Latest CME Events & Activities

Patient, Provider, and Caregiver Connection: Addressing Pediatric and AYA Patient Concerns While Managing Hodgkin Lymphoma

View More

Patient, Provider, and Caregiver Connection™: Individualizing Care for Patients with Schizophrenia—Understanding Patient Challenges and the Role of Innovative Treatment

View More

Improving Outcomes in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias at the Intersection Between Hematology and Oncology Care

View More

B-Cell Tumor Board: Rendering Real World Personalized Treatment Plans in CLL/SLL and MCL Through the Lens of Emerging BTKi Evidence

View More

Applying New Evidence in Multiple Myeloma Care from Frontline to R/R Disease

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 5th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board

View More

Community Oncology Connections™: Overcoming Barriers to Testing, Trial Access, and Equitable Care in Cancer

View More

Translating New Evidence into Treatment Algorithms from Frontline to R/R Multiple Myeloma: How the Experts Think & Treat

View More

Medical Crossfire: How Has Iron Supplementation Altered Treatment Planning for Patients with Cancer-Related Anemia?

View More

Medical Crossfire®: The Experts Bridge Recent Data in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia With Real-World Sequencing Questions

View More

Community Practice Connections™: Pre-Conference Workshop on Immune Cell-Based Therapy

View More

More News


Site Logo

New Questions About Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

September 1st 2006

Multiple myeloma is now the most common indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in North America, with over 5,000 transplants performed yearly (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] data). While the role of ASCT as initial therapy in multiple myeloma has been established by randomized studies, newer therapies are challenging the traditional paradigm. The availability of novel induction agents and newer risk stratification tools, and the increasing recognition of durability of remissions are changing the treatment paradigm. However, even with arduous therapy designed to produce more complete remissions—for example, tandem autologous transplants—we have seen no plateau in survival curves. A tandem autologous procedure followed by maintenance therapy may be performed in an attempt to sustain remission. Sequential autologous transplants followed by nonmyeloablative allotransplants are pursued with the hope of "curing" multiple myeloma. We examine how the key challenges of increasing the response rates and maintaining responses are being addressed using more effective induction and/or consolidation treatments and the need for maintenance therapies after ASCT. We argue that given the biologic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma, risk-adapted transplant approaches are warranted. While the role of curative-intent, dose-intense toxic therapy is still controversial, conventional myeloablative allogeneic transplants need to be reexamined as an option in high-risk aggressive myeloma, given improvements in supportive care and transplant-related mortality.